Merging Google Places and Google+? The Semantic Web is Nigh.
Michael Cipielewski |
Wednesday, July 6, 2011 at 8:13AM | Early reports and tests from my SEO collegues shows that Google+ buttons may outclip Twitter and Facebook sharing in search engine results pages – or as one collegue put it “SERP Control, Baby. SERP control.”
What was also announced by Google VP of Local and Commerce Jeff Huber earlier this week at Mike Blumenthal’s Blog is, yes, there will be Google+ Business Pages available soon. The conversation progressed to discussing Facebook’s gentle nudge to merge brand pages and Facebook places pages, which brings us to the Google product in question.
What is happening to Google Places during the launch of Google+? The answer: lots. A whole bowl of semantic, social, SERP control lots.
Google Places used to allow businesses to input all their own information, including custom fields, which could broaden their search footprint and (hopefully) deliver that location to potential customers looking for their product or service.

Google has changed the way Places work to a more aggregate semantic use of the web and provided a broader scope of services offered.
I used the example search “restaurants ann arbor” and clicked in the first listing: Zingerman’s Deli. (Which, if you haven’t had yet, you should. Tasty stuff.) Their Places page is partly what we have come to expect in 2011; the page aggregates reviews and information from other sites like Yelp, Trip Advisor and Zagat:
What is drastically different is how Google now handles details – or rather, the details provided by the business owner. Simply put, what was once the ubiquitous information for potential customers and for Google to determine search relevance, is now a footnote.
Hover a cursor over any of the details and Google will show the source of the information. A quick check shows that almost none of the information is provided by the business owner. It’s mostly 3rd party reviews and information. A pop-up allows viewers to click-thru to the source material:

We don’t need to speculate long why the change occurred; according to a Retail Online Integration study, 83% of people are influenced, if only a little, by reviews and information from real people. If peoples’ opinions and not sales pitches drive the whole web, of course Google would collect as many opinions as possible to give a richer and more useful experience.
Enter the semantic web: a confluence of aggregated content voted up or down by users constantly, wiki-esque, ever evolving and therefore harder (dare I say nearly impossible?) to game. Making Google Places more descriptive using mostly aggregate social content while also launching Google+, a social platform that is demonstrably affecting search results already in the beta stage, is just too coincidental.
Will there be integration between Google+ Business Pages and Google Places? Nearly simultaneous steps in both Google products may suggest a move to a more socially driven search engine experience and (possibly) more control given to the business again. As always, we are waiting for Google.


